![]() ![]() ![]() He is now an angler fish, which is ironic but also highly interesting since he has the female angler fish design rather than a male. ![]() However, his redesign scrapped that look and focused more on the nature of his death rather than who he used to be or what time he lived in. However, he is dressed as an onboard concierge since he drowned on a ship. (Ironic because he’s not a main character…) Now his initial design is again, a suit and hat. He’s visibly shorter than the rest of the men, which immediately makes him stand out. Stolas, Moxxie, Striker(?), Asmodeus, Fizzarolli(?), Seviathan(?), Wally Wackford and Baxter are 6/8īlitzo’s father Cash, Andrealphus, and Tom Trench are 4/8Īgent One, Collin, Vortex, and Millie’s father Joe, are 3/8Īnd Cletus, the little angel boy, is 1/8 …behold, the ideal vivziepop male character who embodies the least of her repetitions(she might not have even designed him) : These features may not always be a problem, but they are repetitive and they are easy to spot.Īlastor, Angel Dust, Husker, Sir Pentious, and Lucifer are 8/8 for these, while other characters have a few points less. There’s a big pattern to her main character's design. Viv got really defensive on twitter over this a few months back and a lot of people, including Viv herself misunderstood the criticism. Score: 7.5/10 keithlovesmovies.Excited someone asked! (Oh boy, prepare yourselves) When compared to top animated films, this one does not come close but it is still a cute film and an enjoyable experience for both kids and adults alike. I thought the film's message wasn't as good as the first but it was still good. I also thought he sounded less like an Adam Sandler character than he did in the first film. Just like the first film, I thought the voice work was good all around and Dracula was still my favorite character. I think (and possibly others) that if the film was just more of the same, it would have been quite boring. The jokes were a little less stupid than the first film but I still found them funny for the most part. There are still funny moments involving the other monsters in the hotel but those are toned down from the first film. There are just as many, or maybe more funny moments and one-liners than the first film. I liked this direction better as I greatly enjoyed the scenes between Dracula, Dennis, and all the other monsters. The film was more about the Dracula and Mavis relationship which I thought was the secondary focus of the first film. I thought the story was better than the first film as it focused more on the family aspect than the hotel itself. I saw it in 3D which it gave it some nice touches bringing the monsters and the intricacies of the castle to life but I think it would be just as good without it. Like the first film, the animation isn't groundbreaking but I thought it looked good on the theater screen. I hate stories that don't make sense because it just makes me feel bad for kids who keep fooling for it. To me the things that make a good animated film are it sounds it simple but good animation and a good story, not a stupid story that just doesn't make sense. Maybe it's because they remind me of my childhood. I am an adult but I'm not afraid to admit that I like to watch animated kids films. Things for them then get more complicated when Dracula's old-school father Vlad (Mel Brooks) pays an unexpected visit. To help with this, Dracula asks his monster friends The Invisible Man (David Spade), The Mummy (Keegan-Michael Key), The Werewolf (Steve Buscemi), and Frankenstein (Kevin James) to help him train Dennis to be a monster while Mavis and Johnny (Selena Gomez and Andy Samberg) are away on vacation. Not everything is going right for him since Dracula is worried that his half-human grandson Dennis (Asher Blinkoff) hasn't yet shown his vampire side. Now Dracula's (Adam Sandler) Hotel Transylvania is open to humans, things for him are changing for the better. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |